The Newberg Graphic, Newberg Oregon Contact | Site Map | Subscribe | Home

www.NewbergGraphic.com

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nv-contact.gif (1489 bytes)

Nv-advertise.gif (1492 bytes)

Archive

Subscribe

Weather

century21-redo.gif (10779 bytes)

  



Old Fashioned Festival committee lands on its feet; plans in place for annual fete

Local blues band will highlihg musical acts

Bypass effort gathers steam

Bypass committee hears design recommendatoins

By David Sale, Newberg Graphic reporter
E-mail David at dsale@eaglenewspapers.com
   Members of the Newberg-Dundee bypass Project Oversight Steering Team (POST) received an update on the proposed bypass design options at their Friday meeting.
   The design process began in 2004 with establishment of a transit corridor between Newberg and Dayton. The length of the proposed route was divided into four sections, and different design options considered for each.
   At this meeting, representatives of Parametrics, an engineering consulting firm retained by the Oregon Department of Transportation, presented the preferred alternatives for a draft environmental impact statement (EIS), to be considered by the state this fall.
   “We’re looking at stream habitat for fish and animals, as well as impacts to housing and businesses along the route,” said POST member and Yamhill County Commissioner Leslie Lewis. “There’s a whole range of factors to consider in addition to the engineering and cost feasibility.”
   After considering several designs, Parametrics recommends a two-loop interchange between the bypass and Highway 219, in the area of Industrial Way. The loops would be sited on the northwest and southeast quadrants of the interchange, providing good traffic flow with minimum impact on existing development, the study said.
   Along the rest of the bypass route, many options remain on the table, particularly as it passes through the city of Newberg, where three potential designs exist.
   The proposed route through Newberg’s urban growth area would take the bypass from Industrial Parkway past Scott Leavitt Park and SP Newsprint to cross Waterfront Street.  How the bypass will interact with existing streets determines the differences between the proposals.
   One proposal calls for a sunken roadway along much of this distance, with overpasses at River and College streets, and the railroad tracks, where they cross the bypass. This design would have the least visual impact but involves some expense in the form of groundwater protection for the bypass.
    Another option is to build the bypass at or near existing ground level as far as Leavitt Park, then to have it raised on an embankment as it exits town. The railroad, River and College streets would pass through tunnels in the embankment. This would be the most cost-effective design, but with considerable visual impact.
   A third design blends elements of both, with the bypass to run below grade only after it passes Willamette Street, with a raised overpass to be built over River Street.
   All three of the designs will require an easement across SP Newsprint’s property and the removal of some houses bordering 11th Street. The last option would have the least impact on residential areas in Newberg, but would require an considerable relocation on SP Newsprint’s part, which the study suggests might seriously affect their ability to operate.
   The POST will likely make its recommendations at its Aug. 4 meeting. The completed draft environmental impact statement will be published by ODOT in January, following state approval.
   Lewis added that the EIS must then be submitted to the federal Department of Transportation for consideration.  Meanwhile, under Oregon law, local municipalities must enact “interchange area management plans,” to govern land use and zoning around the future bypass interchanges.
   “It’s a time-consuming process, especially in Oregon — the interchange plans are unique, part of our land use regulations,” Lewis said. “We’re still about a year and a half away from a final, completed plan for the bypass.”

Dundee City Council clears one obstacle toward construction of the thoroughfare
   DUNDEE - The city council approved Monday a set of supplemental findings in support of the Newberg-Dundee bypass.
   The resolution was approved by the council with a lone dissent from council member Craig Roggers, who noted for the record that he found Dundee’s participation in the bypass project to be “fiscally ... morally and ethically irresponsible.”
   A public hearing was held prior to the vote, in order to address concerns over the resolution, which would amend portions of Dundee’s comprehensive plan concerning the bypass. The sections of the plan, originally added by ordinance in 2004, were made to permit the Oregon Department of Transportation’s bypass to pass through Dundee.
   The original ordinance, which also endorsed ODOT’s proposed route, were appealed by 1,000 Friends of Oregon, Friends of Yamhill County, and Columbia Empire Farms.
   The state Land Use Board of Appeals found in favor of the city, but stakeholder Columbia Empire Farms pursued the case to the Oregon Court of Appeals.
   That court found that Dundee needed to include additional information in the amendment, regarding state land use Goal 10, which governs land use for housing.
   The bypass route would occupy 60 acres of a 170-acre agricultural holding zone, which is held in reserve for future residential use under Dundee’s comprehensive plan.
   In the new resolution, the city finds that, according to the existing comprehensive plan, sufficient residential land would remain available.
   The finding was based on a buildable lands survey done by the city in 2003. Columbia Empire Farms, in its appeal, argued that Dundee should undertake a new survey, at a cost of at least $30,000, before approving ODOT’s proposal.

From July 19, 2006, Newberg Graphic
Click Here to Subscribe

 

 
SPONSORS:




newbergallery-rotation.gif (6174 bytes)



lesliemitchell.gif (5476 bytes)


 

Copyright 2006 Newberg Graphic, Newberg Oregon
Contact us with your questions or comments about the site.
This site is best viewed with
Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0+