The Newberg Graphic, Newberg Oregon Contact | Site Map | Subscribe | Home

www.NewbergGraphic.com

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nv-contact.gif (1489 bytes)

Nv-advertise.gif (1492 bytes)

Archive

Subscribe

Weather

  



School district throws out bid

Wu town hall a lively discussion of nation's ills

Championship barbecuing returns

Legislators hopeful bill
will include bypass money

A bill passed in thee House,
and now before the Senate,
would raise fees to fix state's roads and bridges

By Amy Grennell, Newberg Graphic Reporter
Email Amy at agrennell@eaglenewspapers.com
   A bill that would increase registration and title fees for Oregon drivers may also help the local Newberg-Dundee bypass effort.
   But Rep. Donna Nelson (R-McMinnville), who represents Dundee and most of Yamhill County, doesn’t trust those funds will be directed to the project. Newberg’s Rep. Vic Backlund (R-Keizer) voted for the increases and believes the bypass will receive funds derived from the bill.
   The House approved House Bill 2041 with a final vote June 23 of 48-11. On Wednesday the Senate voted to defer the bill until Monday.
   The bill authorizes increased registration and title fees on vehicles to raise $2.5 billion over the next 10 years to pay for bridge repair and highway improvements.
   Nelson was one of 11 dissenters on the bill. When asked about HB 2041 her first words were, “I am sad.”
   “I think it’s sad when we have to raise vehicle fees 30 to 55 (percent) ... or a 50 percent increase for commercial trucks ... I think that’s wrong,” she said.
   Car title fees would increase from $30 to $55 starting Jan. 1, 2004, and registration fees would go from $30 to $54. Commercial truck registration fees would increase 53 percent and weight-mile taxes would rise by almost 10 percent. The plan would raise $113.6 million that will be bonded to improve the state’s bridges and roads over the next decade, according to one of the bill’s sponsors, Alan Brown (R - Newport).
   Currently, Oregon has the lowest registration fees in the country.
   Nelson said she was cautious this time around in regard to potential bypass funding. In 2001 she said she was led to believe the bypass would be funded in two separate bills, giving ODOT $500 million in funds through bonding. Because the bypass didn’t receive any funding from the 2001 legislation, she said she doesn’t trust this bill will be any different.
   “There’s no accountability,” she said. “I met with the chair of the OTC and I said, ‘how many people have been given jobs’ (for construction projects) and ... (I) never got the answer.
   “I will continue to ask that we get something from the OTC in writing that speaks to funds we need for the Newberg-Dundee bypass. ...
   “People change and there’s no accountability saying these are the projects. The last money in Coos Bay — they have Colorado people here to work! ... I say bologna when we put other states to work ...”
   Nelson added that ODOT doesn’t have to adhere to the legislative intent for the funds.
   “I said as legislators we need the right to inspect what we expect,” she said. “Every time we do it we find it isn’t being done.”
   The bill also authorizes highway user tax bonds for bridges and to repair highways, allocates funds to certain cities and counties, and establishes a Transportation Reinvestment Fund to exist until Jan. 2, 2008.
   During discussion on the House floor and in smaller groups, Backlund asked if the measure’s list of highway improvement projects would include the Newberg-Dundee bypass and was told that it would.
   “I have had numerous meetings and met with different people including the chair ... (and) the governor himself,” Backlund said.    “The two questions (are) does the House Bill 2041 include modernization funds and the answer is always yes. There is a list of projects of statewide significance. Is the bypass on that list? The answer is again yes. We have been assured by the ODOT (Oregon Department of Transportation) director it will be funded.”
   Whether the bypass is included in the mix of projects the bill would benefit may depend, however, on a provision that projects must be “shovel ready.” The bypass, although it has progressed significantly in the last five years, is years away from construction.
Before Backlund was given the assurance some funds would go toward the bypass, he had already decided to support the bill.
   “I decided a long time ago we needed to repair bridges (in) cities and counties statewide and so the question was how do you pay for it?” he said. “When the fees came into the picture I thought they were reasonable. I didn’t support a gas tax increase, and being involved in the Newberg-Dundee Transportation Improvement Project, it would (likely benefit).”
   The bill is also expected to create about 4,750 family-wage construction jobs in Oregon, which legislators saw as a boon to a the state’s beleaguered economy.
   The Oregon Transportation Commission’s five board members will decide which projects are funded. The bypass has remained on their state list of eight projects of importance. The question of how much money they will have to work with has yet to be answered.
 

From July 5, 2003, Newberg Graphic
Click Here to Subscribe

 

 
SPONSORS:






 

 



 

Copyright 2002 Newberg Graphic, Newberg Oregon
Contact us with your questions or comments about the site.
This site is best viewed with
Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0+